|
Naturalistic
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: August 24, 2006, 05:45:24 PM » |
|
*adds to list*
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
buff
|
|
« Reply #17 on: October 04, 2006, 11:43:15 AM » |
|
Just curious if Nat every got the chance to update the new depot file?? the file seems to be the same old one still? or is it new that I just didn't notice?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naturalistic
|
|
« Reply #18 on: October 04, 2006, 04:51:14 PM » |
|
No, I never got around to it. Got busy with RL stuff, and jack stopped reminding me I'll see what I can do tonight, and hopefully put up the final version. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
buff
|
|
« Reply #19 on: October 11, 2006, 03:57:08 PM » |
|
Nat, can you put a note on first page when u upload it? thnx |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dabaron
|
|
« Reply #20 on: October 12, 2006, 02:37:20 AM » |
|
I just took JJ's and changed it all from buffbag to depot and it has everything you would need  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glarawyn
|
|
« Reply #22 on: November 01, 2006, 01:09:28 PM » |
|
The problem was figuring out a universal "rank" code.
Members shouldn't be allowed to remove other members, but a General/pres should be.
Been trying to figure that out as well. Org Security Module. I ended it up dumbing it down to be ORGRANK0 (org leader) to ORGRANK6 (Applicant in Department). With the check_security() function in the OSM module you can at least setup some sort of security hierarchy. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naturalistic
|
|
« Reply #23 on: November 01, 2006, 01:44:22 PM » |
|
But then you're still going to run into specific settings for the rank... so there's not much of a real bonus in code reduction.
Unless I'm just not seeing what you mean.
If I went by rank ID, I could just say 0 or 1 (pres / gen)
And that would work for everything. (might just add that actually)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
jjones666
|
|
« Reply #24 on: November 01, 2006, 03:32:48 PM » |
|
OMFG, i thought updated version for a minute Natu :-P
-jj-
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naturalistic
|
|
« Reply #25 on: November 01, 2006, 03:59:04 PM » |
|
You said you didn't need my version of it :p And you already posted another version... so I haven't bothered with mine much |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
jjones666
|
|
« Reply #26 on: January 11, 2007, 01:25:38 PM » |
|
Bump for my favourite Campalot superadmin :-)
(Don't wanna post my modules in the A-Z) ;-p
-jj-
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
pusikas
|
|
« Reply #27 on: January 24, 2007, 06:04:54 PM » |
|
Not 100% sure, but I think if I search for something and it isnt in buffbag/depot, I get the full list. Which can take quite some time. Or am I misinterpreting something here?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Luuv Bot-Keeper of Vengeance ^^*
|
|
|
|
pusikas
|
|
« Reply #28 on: January 26, 2007, 04:22:11 AM » |
|
Now it doesnt do that anymore. Duh. A few days ago it always dumped the complete list on me when I searched for a fragment of the source. Now it correctly says that it doesnt have it. Strange...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Luuv Bot-Keeper of Vengeance ^^*
|
|
|
|
Malosar
|
|
« Reply #29 on: February 05, 2007, 03:21:43 PM » |
|
I've decided to update this again. We wanted the ql's which was updated beforehand and thanks for that however we didn't like it deleting the whole entry when specifying an id, if there's a quantity for that item. So i've made it, by default, delete 1 from the quantity instead of deleting the entry entirely (in the case there's more than 1 of course). Also you can specify an amount on the delete command to remove a certain quantity (or all) from that entry.
Also fixed the contributor check for removing items.
edit: and oh yes, my version I renamed back to depot (sorry JJ) as we prefer that command/name. /s/depot/buffbag ftw
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 09, 2007, 10:35:26 AM by Malosar »
|
Logged
|
Eternalist
General of The Syndicate
|
|
|
|
Content
Total Members: 983
